Interesting blip about a man in Vancouver who was denied a permit for a job because — somehow — the police know he is kinky.
Panel may rule if sex practices protected
[snip]
An appeals court rejected a bid by Vancouver police on Tuesday to block a hearing on whether Peter Hayes’ rights were violated when an officer refused to grant him the permit he needed to get a chauffeur’s job.
Hayes complained to British Columbia’s Human Rights Tribunal that he was discriminated against because he is a pagan who practices a “BDSM lifestyle” and deserves protection under the human rights code, based on sexual orientation.
[snip]
A B.C. Court of Appeal panel ruled unanimously that the police motion was premature since the tribunal’s hearing was to decide what, if any, sexual practices deserved legal protection, and even the tribunal’s chairwoman was unsure if the human rights code did that.
“How can the tribunal determine if BDSM falls within the meaning of ’sexual orientation’ if it does not have a full understanding of what BDSM means?” Justice Anne Rowles wrote for the three-judge panel.
I can’t figure out why this was even an issue. Especially in Canada. I can’t help but suspect that there’s something else going on here that Reuters doesn’t know or didn’t cover.
I wonder how the panel will learn about BDSM? Will they look at shock-porn? Start with hardcore at Kink.com? Or will they prepare first with books that go into the psychology, creativity and respect of it all, like those from authors like Dossie Easton and Jay Wiseman? I recommend they read Carrie’s Story, a novel I return to often.
I think if you’ve truly never felt desire to spank or be spanked, or to play power exchange, or any of the myriad longings that fall under BDSM, starting with video is going to put you off the topic forever. It will just look like people hurting each other and you won’t “get” what’s going on under the surface. Kink.com will scare you and if it turns you on it will just scare you even more.
I’m interested in learning whether everyone on that panel is completely vanilla in thought and desire and ignorant of any part of the realm of BDSM, or whether they have desires, or practices, that’s already given them a hint. And if the latter, will they say so, or will they come down harder on people like Hayes out of fear that they would be exposed? I think by now we all know that the more you tighten your grip, the more things slip through your fingers, and it’s better not to try to hide that which someone is certain to be digging into.
Here’s my tip: bury ‘em in content or data until it’s too much work to find the one nugget they’re after. Bwahahhaah.