Interesting piece about writer-reader relationships over at Salon today. What’s funny is that I cannot relate at all to what the author claims is the old way of being a writer. I’m so community driven. Hence the forum. Hence the blogs. I could never do what I do without constant conversation with readers. Without the roles of writer and reader being fluid, traded back and forth seamlessly. Imagine reading Sex Drive without any sense of community or input! Imagine if I wrote Sex Drive as if I were some lofty academic or expert or smarter-than-thou journalist, with the relationship mostly one way, flowing from my brain to yours.
I’m definitely writing at the right time. Even as it gets harder to make a living writing, it is a wonderful time to be a professional writer.
The readers strike back | Salon.com
Until the Internet came along, actual readers barely dented a writer’s consciousness. Before the whole world got wired, the only way readers could respond to a piece was by writing a letter to the editor, or (much less frequently) to the author, putting it in a stamped envelope, and sticking it in a mailbox. As a result, the number of letters was a tiny fraction of what it is in the age of e-mail. And that number was further diminished by an editor who trimmed the few selected letters to meet space considerations and winnowed out the cranks. An article might have been read by 10,000 people, but the writer never knew it. A dozen letters constituted a deluge.
Posted by regina lynn | general | Comments Off







