<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The changing definition of &#8216;pervert&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reginalynn.com/2008/01/02/the-changing-definition-of-pervert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reginalynn.com/2008/01/02/the-changing-definition-of-pervert/</link>
	<description>Where sex and tech come together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: regina lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.reginalynn.com/2008/01/02/the-changing-definition-of-pervert/comment-page-1/#comment-24980</link>
		<dc:creator>regina lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reginalynn.com/?p=356#comment-24980</guid>
		<description>Exactly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xylitol</title>
		<link>http://www.reginalynn.com/2008/01/02/the-changing-definition-of-pervert/comment-page-1/#comment-24979</link>
		<dc:creator>Xylitol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reginalynn.com/?p=356#comment-24979</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I may have to change my language use a bit, among most I talk to &quot;pervert&quot; is kind of a reclaimed term, i.e. anyone practicing or into slightly non-mainstream sex (whatever that might be at a given time). To me it feels like a fairly neutral term in and of itself, a good or a bad thing depending on the situation. Sort of the opposite of vanilla or reserved, someone who would at the very least not be offended by things they have to make up strange euphemisms to talk about on broadcast networks and might even be into them or willing to find out if they are.

Might have to take more care in proudly proclaiming pervertedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I may have to change my language use a bit, among most I talk to &#8220;pervert&#8221; is kind of a reclaimed term, i.e. anyone practicing or into slightly non-mainstream sex (whatever that might be at a given time). To me it feels like a fairly neutral term in and of itself, a good or a bad thing depending on the situation. Sort of the opposite of vanilla or reserved, someone who would at the very least not be offended by things they have to make up strange euphemisms to talk about on broadcast networks and might even be into them or willing to find out if they are.</p>
<p>Might have to take more care in proudly proclaiming pervertedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

